Trig two, drop weight activated upon door opening. Without going as far as the prosecutor in overstating the probative value, therefore, we do conclude the risk of prejudice was so conspicuously slight that it did not substantially outweigh the probative value the explosion-making incident had in establishing that Paul did have some familiarity, even if rudimentary, with working with explosives. Third Appellate District (Colusa) (Super. We will review that evidence in two steps: first, we will outline the evidence of solid, credible value the jury could have reasonably relied upon in finding Paul guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. I received another package via USPS, target two, I will not take this job because the info I received is wrong. He dropped his clippings from his landscape business 40 yards from the pump. This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. He ran for about two miles to get help. Having reviewed the evidence offered by the prosecution, we now turn to the evidence presented by the defense that Peter, not Paul, planted the bomb that killed Roberto Ayala, for he too appeared to disdain the man, he too had the opportunity and familiarity with the irrigation pump, he too had access to the area in which the bomb was planted, and he too had incriminating evidence on his computer hard drive. Of course, the evidence was damaging, for it confirmed the prosecution's basic theory of the case, that a disappointed, angry, and envious man killed the foreman who threatened him most in his father's eyes. "We've waited 25 months and seven days for this moment," said Eduardo Ayala, brother of the victim. On November 24 they noticed the device was not working and they went to Paul's house to investigate. This information was not disclosed to the public. Neither Peter's nor Paul's DNA matched swabs taken from the letters, envelopes, and stamps. Are you concerned about the rising tensions with North Korea? To understand if, why, and how Paul would have blown up Roberto, the prosecution attempted to tell the painful story of the men of the Moore family farm and their tortured relationships. "That's why I took the case.". Peter's house was searched a few days after the explosion. He learned that a bell rang every time a verdict was made. Burial service, Funeral service, Memorial service, Cremation, Special service for veterans, Pre-arrangements, Grief support, Caskets & Vaults & Urns and more products . 107 5th Street, Colusa, CA 95932 (People v. Jacobs (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 728, 737-738.) The jury was properly reminded to consider the evidence solely for its tendency to prove Paul's knowledge of electrical and technical devices. For example, Roberto traveled with Peter to a seminar about operating a sod business, but when Peter expressed interest in purchasing a harvester, Roberto alerted Roger, and Roger disapproved of the purchase. (b).) According to Paul, something had been placed at the pump to cause the explosion. IPeter or Paul: Substantial Evidence to Support the Verdict. He was fired as the director of a duck club because he offended some of the members. The jurors could have found his behavior odd, even calculated to focus the investigators' attention on his cousin. 2023 Cinemaholic Inc. All rights reserved. He remained so bitter toward his father he begged his grandmother to disinherit him. To be sure, Paul had demonstrated an advanced mechanical aptitude and an understanding of electrical currents. There was no undue consumption of time since Paul's ex-father-in-law explained what he knew about Paul's involvement in creating an explosion in a paragraph or two. Peter testified he was going to physically beat up Roberto. We concur: On July 12, 2011, Peter had texted Paul that he had been landscaping for 21 years, needed to get out, wanted to farm, was trying to get people to talk to Roger, and hoped that Paul would talk to Roger to help him get started farming. Higher wind gusts possible. He will rather seek life in prison without parole for Paul Moore. Name, age, vehicle I.D. This vehicle info is the same as the first job. Marysville woman celebrates 100th birthday, Livestock auction returns to Colusa fairgrounds. We must accept its determination. The trial court agreed with the prosecutor's position that the defense argument put in issue virtually all evidence that tended to show Paul's motive, technical skills, and past related actions and opened the door to fair comment on any and all evidence tending to link him to the crime. According to Peter, the Ayala brothers agitated Paul and he remarked, Those son-of-a-bitches, they are trying to take over my life. December: On December 6 Paul's house was searched. According to the Environmental Working Group Farm Subsidy Database, Moore Brothers received about $2.1 million in subsidies from 1995-2014. The target is brother of target one and drives Chevy. A state appeals court this week upheld Paul Moore's murder conviction. Considered in context, there is no danger the jurors were misled or that the document examiner's expert testimony was falsely elevated to the stature of DNA evidence. Published: Jun 17, 2016 Total records: 5,262. Paul returned to work on the farm a few years before the explosion. #Dateline tonight at 9/8c. What is Roger Moore's Net Worth? I am over this life. Ct. No. And because the explosion would be instantaneous, the victim would still be in contact with the electrical panel and would be electrocuted. His son, Fabian, who was 7 at the time, witnessed the explosion and ran two miles through fields to find help. Rogers exact whereabouts as of 2020 remain unknown. In other words, Martin believed Peter's bark is much bigger than his bite. Martin had never seen Peter actually engage in any sort of violence. He discovered what the prosecution experts had all missedthat the user of Peter's computer had visited a YouTube rat trap video. Nor was there a terrible danger of unnecessarily inciting the jurors' passions. Peter testified that two months before the explosion, his father told Roberto that if Peter came on the farm, Roberto should have him arrested for trespassing. The investigators placed a GPS (global positioning system) device on his truck, devices that often malfunction. The first responders believed Roberto's truck had been moved because the broken glass was located about 11 feet away and a piece of glass was in the rear tire tread. In his trial, he received a guilty verdict and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. And this would be, in my explanation, it takes a little bit of time, but this is near instantaneously. District Attorney John Poyner said Parisi was the best defense attorney he has ever gone up against. Paul's narrative of family intrigue has all the earmarks of a Shakespearean tragedy and makes for compelling drama. The settlement awarded the family $20 million as well as $44,800 in workers compensation payment. We are not at liberty to reweigh evidence or revisit credibility issues. The forensic evidence, as we have described it, connects Paul to the drafting of the second letter and bomb diagram sent to the sheriff's department. On August 15 the investigators received a second letter and a diagram of a bomb. The family of a Colusa County man killed in a 2011 bombing obtained a $20 million judgment against his killer, an attorney said last Wednesday. Affirmed. The boy had to run two miles to get help. The circumstantial evidence against Paul Moore included opportunity to plant the bomb and familiarity with the farms, a unique skill set to fix electrical and pump problems, and Pauls bringing investigators a piece of metal he found near the explosion. Paul's voice was powerful circumstantial evidence the prosecution had every right to exploit. Becoming windy late. The investigators would later discover that Paul had deleted individual text messages he had sent to and received from Peter. February 3, 2023 (75 years old) View obituary. He thought the police were there to search for medical marijuana he was growing. Roger encouraged Roberto to seek a restraining order against Peter, but Roberto declined. Paul said the evidence was no big deal; he said the sheet was found in his house by the window, and he probably leaned on it and opened the window.. The jury was well acquainted with the wiretapping evidence as well as with Paul's description of his life. During his apprenticeship, Paul worked alongside Roberto. (Evid. That evidence, Paul argued, pointed to Peter's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He has endangered others in his family. "It was owned by Moore farms, but was only driven by Roberto," Gingery said. Diane Nichols, under appointment by . At trial there was no evidence Paul climbed a telephone pole to attach a wire to the line or any other evidence as to how Paul actually wiretapped the telephone. The fact that the prosecutor chose to highlight the damaging evidence only in response to the defense claims that Peter, not Paul, had killed Roberto Ayala and that he had no motive or nothing to gain from the killing was a strategic choice the prosecutors made. I am military trained. According to CBS Sacramento, the Sheriffs Office received a letter on August 12, 2011 claiming responsibility for detonating the bomb. On top of that, Roger surely had the resources to ensure everyone was looked after. The straightedge drawing is -- the diagram depicts -- what we're led to believe is that the diagram depicts the electrical box. Paul appears to have suffered more quietly than his cousin. Search by Name, Phone, Address, or Email. pic.twitter.com/trQ6iY5jej, Dateline NBC (@DatelineNBC) July 24, 2020. Unfortunately, Arlan passed away, leaving Roger to handle the affairs. A month before the explosion, Roger learned from Paul that Peter threatened to injure Roberto. She thereafter requested the opportunity to offer a surrebuttal. They now want the white Ford F-250 hit. After the verdict, Parisi said she still believes a lot of questions went unanswered and that she will likely appeal the decision. We are not at liberty to second-guess the trial court's careful and reasoned assessment, and because we find there is no abuse of discretion, there was no error in admitting the evidence. Paul Moore was arrested five months after the explosion after a search warrant was executed at his home by the Colusa County Sherrif's Office assisted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,. Installing a device inside such a panel is a highly dangerous activity. But 12 jurors of Pauls peers found that the circumstantial evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he murdered Roberto Ayala, and we must respect their verdict., The appeals court also said that Paul complained bitterly about his life growing up on the farm and felt mistreated by everyone., The Sun Herald article states that the appeals court said the murder case was a classic whodunit. Ayala was killed in an explosion in 2013. Expert in Vietnam devices. The outside square of the diagram is the electrical box that we've described.. ADVICE: Are North Americans wimps when it comes to pain tolerance? The settlement also included about $44,800 in worker's compensation payments. Later, as a father, Paul taught Gunner how to hard-wire electronics to his car battery so he would not have to use the cigarette lighter to power the electronics in his car. Thus it was relevant and probative of his knowledge of creating explosions. Low 41F. She concluded that all the samples came from the same spool or another spool having the same chemical composition and physical characteristics. The email address cannot be subscribed. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. They observed his vehicle leave the shop and the driver accelerated and eventually passed them at over 90 miles per hour. He argues that the trial court's error violated his right to a fair trial and due process of law under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. It's leveraged in between there. Records published here were acquired from Colusa . I received info and instructions via USPS. He claimed Roberto was a good person but admitted he became upset when he saw Roberto drinking and driving on the farm. They seized this sheet but not the sheets of paper below it. Roberto was not an impediment to his ambitions. Half of the amount will go to Jesus, Maria and Paola Ayala, while the other half will be placed in an annuity for Roberto's now 12-year-old son. The prosecution need not, as we know, prove motive. Paul objects to the prosecutor's use of a DNA analogy. PAUL ROGER MOORE, Defendant and Appellant. There is no direct evidence that Peter knew Roberto's precise work schedule or routine, but a jury could reasonably infer that he understood that a foreman's responsibility included adjusting the water levels on the rice fields. SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Paul Moore was convicted in state court announced Colusa County District Attorney John R. Poyner, Colusa County Sheriff Scott D. Marshall, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), San Francisco Field Division Special Agent in Charge Joseph M. Riehl. Low 41F. Little Fabian ran through the sunflower fields, as far as he could, to get help for his father More Friday at 9/8c with @Dateline_Keith. On appeal, Paul challenges the court's denial of her request. The evidence is all circumstantial. Roberto was Peter's nemesis, and it was Peter, not Paul, who stood to gain the most once he was removed. They gave me two months 4 this job. A bomb-sniffing dog did not alert on anything explosive in the house, garage, or truck. "I said, 'Pete, the jury now knows it was not Peter Moore, it was Paul Moore," Poyner said. Nothing precluded defense counsel from confronting that evidence in her closing argument. In addition, he had a violent disposition and leveled threats to harm not only Roberto, but his father, his uncle, and many others who upset him. The investigators did not desire to have personal contact with Paul at the time, so when he saw them driving by his house, the investigators drove away from the area. C075231 (Super. During trial, however, the defense offered the testimony of an expert in forensic computer analysis. Paul's animosity toward Roberto and his feelings of humiliation and resentment were simmering for years, and who better to express his feelings, and inferentially his motive, to the jury than Paul himself? The trial court cannot be said to have abused its discretion by admitting highly relevant evidence when the only prejudice is the fact the story Paul himself told was a damaging one. Nevertheless, there was probative value in establishing Paul's lifelong familiarity and experimentation with all types of electrical and mechanical devices. He took on additional responsibilities as his back healed, and by July 2011 Roger had decided to bring on Paul as a 50 percent partner of his half of the farm operation. Word On The Street: Community weighs in on Governor Newsom's death penalty executive order. A jury convicted defendant Paul Roger Moore of first degree murder based exclusively on circumstantial evidence that he built and planted a victim-activated bomb in an irrigation pump he knew the farm foreman and eventual victim, Roberto Ayala, would activate. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PAUL ROGER MOORE, Defendant and Appellant. He felt mistreated by everyone, including Peter. They will find him. Most damning, they found a sheet of paper with indentations that appeared to match the diagram of the bomb sent to the sheriff. A Colusa County judge approved the judgment last month in the wrongful death lawsuit filed in 2013 by Jesus, Maria and Paola Ayala against Moore Brothers, Arlan Moore, Paul Moore and Roger Moore. He explained that the indented sheet appeared to have been placed beneath the document that was actually written even though some of the lines did not align perfectly. The investigators took possession of three computers and three cellular telephones. If the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, we must defer to the trier of fact; yet a verdict cannot be sustained based on suspicion alone, or on imagination, speculation, supposition, surmise, conjecture, or guess work.' pic.twitter.com/Fu6Kov30EN, Dateline NBC (@DatelineNBC) July 23, 2020. Two-inch gallon pipe and quart of gasoline in plastic bottle. Paul injured his back and had to give up construction. Dr. Svetlana Moore is a Family Medicine Doctor in Colusa, CA. Peter texted, When [Roberto's] wing is better, he's all mine. Peter testified that when he wrote the message he was planning to beat up Roberto. Low 41F. McNary-Moore Funeral Service in Colusa, CA. He pointed out that the markings or threading on the metal indicated to him the explosion was not an accident. Over defense objection, Paul's ex-father-in-law testified that Paul apologized to him for tapping his daughter's telephone when they were going through a divorce, putting some kind of recorder under her modular home so he could monitor conversations. Whether or not there is some authority to support the questionable proposition that a prosecutor's rebuttal is limited by the scope of the facts and evidence argued in the defendant's closing argument, the prosecutor did not introduce evidence outside the record or float a completely new theory of guilt. In fact, after Roberto injured his shoulder, Paul accompanied him on occasion to the irrigation pumps to adjust water levels. A trace evidence examiner found the fishing line recovered from Paul's boat had the same chemical composition as the line around the bolt found at the site of the explosion. Upon detonation gas atomized for millisecond, completed the circuit triggering flashover, thus electrocution, fail safe and no disarming. Click to reveal The writing is comprised in a similar fashion as the letters themselves. Without debating semantics, the point is that we must defer to the trial court's determination whether the evidence is substantially more prejudicial than probative unless the court has strayed too far from what is reasonable and sound. We conclude the risk was very low. But it is the jury's prerogative, not ours, to weigh the evidence. The bolts were just like the bolt discovered at the scene of the explosion. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Rain. The evidence demonstrates that Paul had, on at least one occasion, experimented with explosive substances. A defendant's writings have been admitted to prove motive over defense objection. The freehand drawing has some arrows on it. The evidence will show that the explosive device in this case was housed inside a 480-volt high amperage pump control panel. I got name, age, vehicle description, plate number and location. hkruger@appealdemocrat.com. Believe me and have time to do something to help these guys.. Our sole duty, as we wrote at the outset, is only to insure that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict this jury reached. And Roberto Ayala, in particular, was the target of his wrath. Most significantly, Peter broadcast his contempt for Roberto. Becoming windy overnight. Moore is the owner of the Moore Brothers Farm. Paul Moore is the son of Roger Moore, who co-owns the 1,800 acre family farm with his brother, Gus Moore. Our Customers Our company legacy is a living force that drives our constant quest to perfect the art of growing produce. The settlement also included about $44,800 in worker's compensation payments. A jury convicted defendant Paul Roger Moore of first degree murder based exclusively on circumstantial evidence that he built and planted a victim-activated bomb in an irrigation pump he knew the farm foreman and eventual victim, Roberto Ayala, would activate.